Builder Fined Over £10,000 After Threatening HSE Inspectors and Claiming to Be 'James Bond'

A site manager, who identified himself to Health and Safety Executive (HSE) inspectors as ‘James Bond’, has been fined over £10,000 for threatening behaviour and obstructing their work. David Robert Lane, 59, refused to cooperate with inspectors investigating unsafe practices at a cottage refurbishment site in Staffordshire.

Key Takeaways

A builder claimed to be ‘James Bond’ when confronted by HSE inspectors.
He threatened the inspectors and refused to allow them to inspect the site.
The builder was fined £3,000, with £6,450 in court costs and a £1,200 victim surcharge.
The HSE emphasised its zero-tolerance policy towards the obstruction of its inspectors.

Confrontation and Threats

The incident occurred on February 11, 2025, when two HSE inspectors observed workers accessing a roof from an excavator bucket at a site in Rugeley. When they approached to conduct their inspection, Lane intervened. He refused to provide his real name, stating he was ‘James Bond’, and claimed to be the property owner. He asserted that the workers were unpaid friends and relatives and that the inspectors had no legal right to be there. Lane then made threats of violence, leading the inspectors to withdraw from the site.

Return with Police and Prosecution

The inspectors returned a week later, accompanied by officers from Staffordshire Police. Lane greeted them with a shout of “It’s PC Plod!” and continued to refuse identification. He instructed his staff not to speak to the HSE, reiterating that they were not at work and that the inspectors should leave. Following further inquiries, Lane was identified as the site manager and served with enforcement action. Upon notification of prosecution for obstruction under the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, Lane sent three expletive-laden emails, stating, “I won’t jump through your hoops.”

Court Proceedings and Sentencing

David Robert Lane, of Rugeley, Staffordshire, failed to attend Birmingham Magistrates Court on two separate occasions. He was found guilty in his absence on January 9 and subsequently fined £3,000. He was also ordered to pay £6,450 in court costs and a £1,200 victim surcharge, bringing the total to £10,650.

HSE Statement

HSE inspector Gareth Langston commented on the case, highlighting the challenges faced in ensuring workplace health and safety across Great Britain. He stressed that HSE inspectors have a vital role in safeguarding workers and that while most employers cooperate professionally, obstruction will not be tolerated. “HSE will not tolerate the obstruction of its inspectors, and may prosecute offenders in rare cases such as this, where this is necessary,” Langston stated.